AN AMERICAN researcher has claimed he is just weeks away from realising a science-fiction dream: the creation of artificial life.
Craig Venter, a controversial and flamboyant DNA scientist, said he is about to produce a synthetic living cell that is capable of reproducing itself.
If Venter delivers on his bold promise it will rank as one of the greatest scientific breakthroughs of recent years. It could open the door to a new generation of artificial life forms designed to tackle everything from disease in humans to environmental crises.
But while the Maryland-based scientist has caused excitement in scientific quarters, he has also prompted a renewed ethical debate on the acceptable limits of research into the building blocks of life. As well as concern over "playing god", some experts fear the creation of a new species could have safety implications.
Chromosomes are at the centre of Venter's breakthrough. In the simplest forms of life, every cell has a chromosome, which is a long string of DNA that "tells" the cell what kind it is, what to do and when. He has used laboratory chemicals to create an artificial chromosome, based on a "stripped-down" version of a bacterium.
The next step involves inserting the artificial chromosome into a natural cell from a bacterium. Venter said the artificial chromosome will take over its host cell, effectively becoming a new artificial form of life. Crucially, it will have the ability to reproduce itself.
Venter believes the technique will work because his team has already successfully transplanted chromosomes from one bacteria cell to another. If the technique works as expected, the next step will be to genetically alter the genetic make-up of the synthetic chromosome to deal with specific real-work tasks. For example, it is theoretically possible to make an artificial life form to consume greenhouse gases.
Venter, a Vietnam veteran and a yachtsman, has provoked controversy in the past because of his flamboyant style and his commercial approach to science. In the 1990s, he turned the human genome project into a competition by effectively racing publicly funded scientists to complete the map of the human gene.
He said: "This will be a very important philosophical step in the history of our species. We are going from reading our genetic code to the ability to write it. That gives us the hypothetical ability to do things never contemplated before."
Venter added he had carried out an ethical review before completing the experiment. He said: "We feel that this is good science. We are not afraid to take on things that are important just because they stimulate thinking. We are dealing in big ideas. We are trying to create a new value system for life. When dealing at this scale, you can't expect everybody to be happy."
Grahame Bulfield, vice-principal of Edinburgh University and professor of genetics, said: "This is a technical tour de force rather than an intellectual breakthrough. But it opens up molecular genetics to a huge range of new possibilities and applications, and should give much more control over how it is done."
James Milner-White, professor of structural bio-informatics at Glasgow University, said: "It's potentially very exciting. I would want to know more about what is happening in the experiments and whether the life forms they create are viable. I note that they haven't mentioned that yet. If the life forms are viable, then it could be very significant."
Dr Mark Bailey, a lecturer in genetics at Glasgow University, said:
"If this work does produce viable bacteria, the next step will be to add genes to them to get them to do what you want them to do. Adding the genes is actually quite straightforward, but getting them to do what you want in the way you want is very challenging. That will take some years of work."
But the news has provoked concern among campaigners who want restraints on the research being pioneered by genetic scientists.
Pat Mooney, director of Canadian bioethics organisation ETC group, said: "Governments, and society in general, are way behind the ball. This is a wake-up call: what does it mean to create new life forms in a test tube?"
He said Venter was creating a "chassis on which you could build almost anything. It could be a contribution to humanity such as new drugs or a huge threat to humanity such as bio-weapons."
음성 인공지능 분야에서 스타트업이 생각해볼 수 있는 전략은 아마 다음과 같이 3가지 정도가 있을 것이다: 독자적 Vertical 음성 인공지능 Application 구축 기 음성 플랫폼을 활용한 B2B2C 형태의 비지니스 구축 기 음성 플랫폼...
네이버, KT, 오라클, 그리고 잠깐의 사업을 거쳐 삼성전자에 입사한지도 2년이 지났습니다. 2016년 병신년을 뒤로하며 이번에는 꽤 색다른 도전에 나섭니다. 무슨 일이야!? 국내 O2O 숙박전문 회사 CTO로 조인합니다! 존! 나 고...
우리는 남들의 비판을 경험하면서 창조적 사고를 포기하게 된다. 비판으로부터 방어논리와 자기 검열에 취중한 나머지 더 이상 사고에 자유롭지 못하게 되니까 그렇다. 남들의 비판을 두려워하지 않는 자세.. 그것이 순수한 창조적 사고를 지속하는 방법이다...
“군자는 어울리되 패거리를 짓지 않고, 소인은 패거리를 짓되 어울리지 않는다." 군자는 의(義)를 높이기에 아부하지 않고, 부화뇌동(附和雷同)하지 않는다. 군자는 대의명분을 지키면서 화합하며 협력한다. 하지만 소인은 이익을 높이기에 이해관...